Skip to content

The laterality of the gallop gait in Thoroughbred racehorses

Paulette Cully, Brian Nielsen, Bryony Lancaster, Jessica Martin, Paul McGreevy
Key takeaways
  1. 01No population-level preference for a specific leading leg was found among Thoroughbred racehorses
  2. 02Many individual horses exhibit a significant and consistent preference for one side over the other
  3. 03Course direction influences the initial gallop lead, particularly on clockwise racing tracks
  4. 04Mares demonstrated a stronger preference for the left leading leg compared to male horses
  5. 05The choice of leading leg at the start did not significantly influence race results

Thoroughbreds show individual leading-leg preferences, but there is no population-wide handedness that significantly impacts their likelihood of winning.

Abstract

Laterality can be observed as side biases in locomotory behaviour which, in the horse, manifest inter alia as forelimb preferences, most notably in the gallop. The current study investigated possible leading-leg preferences at the population and individual level in Thoroughbred racehorses (n = 2095) making halt-to-gallop transitions. Videos of flat races in the UK (n = 350) were studied to record, for each horse, the lead-leg preference of the initial stride into gallop from the starting stalls. Races from clockwise (C) and anti-clockwise (AC) tracks were chosen alternately at random to ensure equal representation. Course direction, horse age and sex, position relative to the inside rail and finishing position were also noted. On C courses, the left/right ratio was 1.15, which represents a significant bias to the left (z = -2.29, p = 0.022), while on AC courses it was 0.92 (z = 0.51, p = 0.610). In both course directions, there was no significant difference between winning horses that led with the left leading leg versus the right (C courses, z = -1.32, p = 0.19 and AC courses, z = -0.74, p = 0.46). Of the 2,095 horses studied 51.26% led with their L fore and 48.74% with their R, with no statistically significant difference (z = -1.16, p = 0.25). Therefore, there was no evidence of a population level motor laterality. Additionally, 22 male and 22 female horses were randomly chosen for repeated measures of leading leg preference. A laterality index was calculated for each of the 44 horses studied using the repeated measures: 22 exhibited right laterality (of which two were statistically significant) and 21 exhibited left laterality (eight being statistically significant); one horse was ambilateral. Using these data, left lateralized horses were more strongly lateralized on an individual level than the right lateralized horses (t = 2.28, p = 0.03, DF = 34) and mares were more left lateralized than males (t = 2.4, p = 0.03, DF = 19).

Cite this study
APA
Paulette Cully, Brian Nielsen, Bryony Lancaster, Jessica Martin, & Paul McGreevy (2018). The laterality of the gallop gait in Thoroughbred racehorses. https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/the-laterality-of-the-gallop-gait-in-thoroughbred-racehorses/
MLA
Paulette Cully, et al. "The laterality of the gallop gait in Thoroughbred racehorses." 2018, https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/the-laterality-of-the-gallop-gait-in-thoroughbred-racehorses/.
Chicago
Paulette Cully et al. 2018. "The laterality of the gallop gait in Thoroughbred racehorses.". https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/the-laterality-of-the-gallop-gait-in-thoroughbred-racehorses/