Skip to content

Bioelectronic microfluidic wound healing: a platform for investigating direct current stimulation of injured cell collectives

Sebastian Shaner, Anna Savelyeva, Anja Kvartuh, Nicole Jedrusik, Lukas Matter, José Leal, Maria Asplund
Key takeaways
  1. 01The body naturally generates electric fields at wound sites to guide cellular repair
  2. 02Uni-directional direct current increased skin cell healing rates nearly three-fold
  3. 03Diabetic-like cells regained normal healing dynamics when treated with controlled electrical stimulation
  4. 04Directed electrical cues were more effective for wound closure than alternating patterns

Directed electrical stimulation can triple the healing rate of skin cells and help diabetic-like cells heal as effectively as healthy ones.

Abstract

Upon cutaneous injury, the human body naturally forms an electric field (EF) that acts as a guidance cue for relevant cellular and tissue repair and reorganization. However, the direct current (DC) flow imparted by this EF can be impacted by a variety of diseases. This work delves into the impact of DC stimulation on both healthy and diabetic in vitro wound healing models of human keratinocytes, the most prevalent cell type of the skin. The culmination of non-metal electrode materials and prudent microfluidic design allowed us to create a compact bioelectronic platform to study the effects of different sustained (12 hours galvanostatic DC) EF configurations on wound closure dynamics. Specifically, we compared if electrotactically closing a wound's gap from one wound edge (i.e., uni-directional EF) is as effective as compared to alternatingly polarizing both the wound's edges (i.e., pseudo-converging EF) as both of these spatial stimulation strategies are fundamental to the eventual translational electrode design and strategy. We found that uni-directional electric guidance cues were superior in group keratinocyte healing dynamics by enhancing the wound closure rate nearly three-fold for both healthy and diabetic-like keratinocyte collectives, compared to their non-stimulated respective controls. The motility-inhibited and diabetic-like keratinocytes regained wound closure rates with uni-directional electrical stimulation (increase from 1.0 to 2.8% h−1) comparable to their healthy non-stimulated keratinocyte counterparts (3.5% h−1). Our results bring hope that electrical stimulation delivered in a controlled manner can be a viable pathway to accelerate wound repair, and also by providing a baseline for other researchers trying to find an optimal electrode blueprint for in vivo DC stimulation.

Cite this study
APA
Sebastian Shaner, Anna Savelyeva, Anja Kvartuh, Nicole Jedrusik, Lukas Matter, José Leal, & Maria Asplund (2023). Bioelectronic microfluidic wound healing: a platform for investigating direct current stimulation of injured cell collectives. https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/bioelectronic-microfluidic-wound-healing-a-platform-for-investigating-direct-current-stimulation-of-injured-cell-collectives/
MLA
Sebastian Shaner, et al. "Bioelectronic microfluidic wound healing: a platform for investigating direct current stimulation of injured cell collectives." 2023, https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/bioelectronic-microfluidic-wound-healing-a-platform-for-investigating-direct-current-stimulation-of-injured-cell-collectives/.
Chicago
Sebastian Shaner et al. 2023. "Bioelectronic microfluidic wound healing: a platform for investigating direct current stimulation of injured cell collectives.". https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/bioelectronic-microfluidic-wound-healing-a-platform-for-investigating-direct-current-stimulation-of-injured-cell-collectives/