Skip to content

Biotensegrity or Fascintegrity

Bruno Bordoni, Matthew A Varacallo, Bruno Morabito, Marta Simonelli
Key takeaways
  1. 01This review critiques the theoretical model of biotensegrity
  2. 02The model omits fluids, nerves, and organ dynamics
  3. 03Mechanical information may travel through liquids, not just solids
  4. 04The term "fascintegrity" is proposed as a more inclusive alternative

The authors propose "fascintegrity" as a more complete model than biotensegrity, as it includes the body's fluids and organs in the mechanical whole.

Abstract

The biotensegrity view of the living is a theoretical model and there is no mathematical study in vitro or in vivo that demonstrates its validity, taking into account the presence of liquids (blood, lymph, water), the tension produced by nerves and blood vessels, just as the displacement of the viscera and their resistances and contractions are not taken into consideration. The concept of cellular transduction is reviewed as it is the key to understanding if the passage of different mechanical information occurs only through solid structures, such as the cytoskeleton, or even liquid and viscous. The article focuses on reviewing the weaknesses of the biotensegrity model in the light of new scientific information, trying to coin another term that better reflects the dynamics of living: fascintegrity.

Cite this study
APA
Bruno Bordoni, Matthew A Varacallo, Bruno Morabito, & Marta Simonelli (2019). Biotensegrity or Fascintegrity. https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/biotensegrity-or-fascintegrity/
MLA
Bruno Bordoni, et al. "Biotensegrity or Fascintegrity." 2019, https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/biotensegrity-or-fascintegrity/.
Chicago
Bruno Bordoni et al. 2019. "Biotensegrity or Fascintegrity.". https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/biotensegrity-or-fascintegrity/