Hoppa till innehåll

Biotensegrity eller fascintegrity

Bruno Bordoni, Matthew A Varacallo, Bruno Morabito, Marta Simonelli
Nyckelinsikter
  1. 01Denna översikt kritiserar den teoretiska modellen biotensegrity
  2. 02Modellen utelämnar vätskor, nerver och organdynamik
  3. 03Mekanisk information kan färdas via vätskor, inte bara fasta strukturer
  4. 04Begreppet "fascintegrity" föreslås som ett mer inkluderande alternativ

Författarna föreslår "fascintegrity" som en mer komplett modell än biotensegrity, eftersom den inkluderar kroppens vätskor och organ i den mekaniska helheten.

Abstract

The biotensegrity view of the living is a theoretical model and there is no mathematical study in vitro or in vivo that demonstrates its validity, taking into account the presence of liquids (blood, lymph, water), the tension produced by nerves and blood vessels, just as the displacement of the viscera and their resistances and contractions are not taken into consideration. The concept of cellular transduction is reviewed as it is the key to understanding if the passage of different mechanical information occurs only through solid structures, such as the cytoskeleton, or even liquid and viscous. The article focuses on reviewing the weaknesses of the biotensegrity model in the light of new scientific information, trying to coin another term that better reflects the dynamics of living: fascintegrity.

Citera denna studie
APA
Bruno Bordoni, Matthew A Varacallo, Bruno Morabito, & Marta Simonelli (2019). Biotensegrity eller fascintegrity. https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/biotensegrity-or-fascintegrity/
MLA
Bruno Bordoni, et al. "Biotensegrity eller fascintegrity." 2019, https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/biotensegrity-or-fascintegrity/.
Chicago
Bruno Bordoni et al. 2019. "Biotensegrity eller fascintegrity.". https://fasciaresearchdatabase.com/biotensegrity-or-fascintegrity/